↓ Skip to main content

Clonal crayfish as biological model: a review on marbled crayfish

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Clonal crayfish as biological model: a review on marbled crayfish
Published in
Biologia, August 2018
DOI 10.2478/s11756-018-0098-2
Authors

Md Shakhawate Hossain, Jiří Patoka, Antonín Kouba, Miloš Buřič

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Environmental Science 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,963,585
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#53
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,128
of 333,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.