| Title |
Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging—Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-018-1348-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian G Abbott, James A Case, Sharmila Dorbala, Andrew J Einstein, James R Galt, Robert Pagnanelli, Renée P Bullock-Palmer, Prem Soman, R Glenn Wells |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 50% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 17% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,563,368
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#315
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,657
of 357,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.