Title |
QMEC: a tool for high-throughput quantitative assessment of microbial functional potential in C, N, P, and S biogeochemical cycling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science China Life Sciences, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11427-018-9364-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bangxiao Zheng, Yongguan Zhu, Jordi Sardans, Josep Peñuelas, Jianqiang Su |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 32% |
Researcher | 20 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 30% |
Unspecified | 16 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,852,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#336
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,433
of 345,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.