↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis and psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Cannabis and psychosis
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/s11920-002-0026-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louisa Degenhardt, Wayne Hall

Abstract

There has been considerable debate about the reasons for the association observed between cannabis use and psychosis in both clinical and general population samples. Among the hypotheses proposed to explain the association are the following: 1) common factors explain the co-occurrence; 2 cannabis causes psychosis that would not have occurred in the absence of cannabis use; 3) cannabis precipitates psychosis among persons who were vulnerable to developing the disorders; 4) cannabis use worsens or prolongs psychosis among those who have already developed the disorder; and 5) that persons with psychosis are more likely to become regular or problematic cannabis users than persons without psychosis. This article evaluates the evidence on each of these hypotheses, including recent research on the role of the cannabinoid receptor system in schizophrenia. The evidence suggests that common factors do not explain the comorbidity between cannabis use and psychosis, and it is unlikely that cannabis use causes psychosis among persons who would otherwise not have developed the disorder. The evidence is more consistent with the hypotheses that cannabis use may precipitate psychosis among vulnerable individuals, increase the risk of relapse among those who have already developed the disorder, and may be more likely to lead to dependence in persons with schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 41%
Psychology 9 28%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#12,938,208
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#763
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,242
of 120,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.