↓ Skip to main content

Why Do Reoperation Rates Vary So Much After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer? Examining the Reoperation Puzzle at the Massachusetts General Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Why Do Reoperation Rates Vary So Much After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer? Examining the Reoperation Puzzle at the Massachusetts General Hospital
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6609-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Landercasper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,761,042
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,561
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,036
of 327,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#64
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.