↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-1929-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Cavallaro, Claudio Sandroni, Cristina Marano, Giuseppe La Torre, Alice Mannocci, Chiara De Waure, Giuseppe Bello, Riccardo Maviglia, Massimo Antonelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Italy 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 306 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 57 17%
Researcher 47 14%
Student > Postgraduate 40 12%
Student > Master 32 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 78 24%
Unknown 49 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 242 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 54 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,689,385
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,342
of 4,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,808
of 96,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.