↓ Skip to main content

Population attributable risks of oral cavity cancer to behavioral and medical risk factors in France: results of a large population-based case–control study, the ICARE study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Population attributable risks of oral cavity cancer to behavioral and medical risk factors in France: results of a large population-based case–control study, the ICARE study
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12885-015-1841-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loredana Radoï, Gwenn Menvielle, Diane Cyr, Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux, Isabelle Stücker, Danièle Luce, ICARE study group

Abstract

Population attributable risks (PARs) are useful tool to estimate the burden of risk factors in cancer incidence. Few studies estimated the PARs of oral cavity cancer to tobacco smoking alone, alcohol drinking alone and their joint consumption but none performed analysis stratified by subsite, gender or age. Among the suspected risk factors of oral cavity cancer, only PAR to a family history of head and neck cancer was reported in two studies. The purpose of this study was to estimate in France the PARs of oral cavity cancer to several recognized and suspected risk factors, overall and by subsite, gender and age. We analysed data from 689 oral cavity cancer cases and 3481 controls included in a population-based case-control study, the ICARE study. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), PARs and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). The PARs were 0.3 % (95 % CI -3.9 %; +3.9 %) for alcohol alone, 12.7 % (6.9 %-18.0 %) for tobacco alone and 69.9 % (64.4 %-74.7 %) for their joint consumption. PAR to combined alcohol and tobacco consumption was 74 % (66.5 %-79.9 %) in men and 45.4 % (32.7 %-55.6 %) in women. Among suspected risk factors, body mass index 2 years before the interview <25 kg.m(-2), never tea drinking and family history of head and neck cancer explained 35.3 % (25.7 %-43.6 %), 30.3 % (14.4 %-43.3 %) and 5.8 % (0.6 %-10.8 %) of cancer burden, respectively. About 93 % (88.3 %-95.6 %) of oral cavity cancers were explained by all risk factors, 94.3 % (88.4 %-97.2 %) in men and only 74.1 % (47.0 %-87.3 %) in women. Our study emphasizes the role of combined tobacco and alcohol consumption in the oral cavity cancer burden in France and gives an indication of the proportion of cases attributable to other risk factors. Most of oral cavity cancers are attributable to concurrent smoking and drinking and would be potentially preventable through smoking or drinking cessation. If the majority of cases are explained by recognized or suspected risk factors in men, a substantial number of cancers in women are probably due to still unexplored factors that remain to be clarified by future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 29 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,240,471
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,362
of 8,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,386
of 284,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#76
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.