↓ Skip to main content

Continuous quality improvement and metabolic screening during pregnancy at primary health centres attended by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Journal of Australia, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous quality improvement and metabolic screening during pregnancy at primary health centres attended by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women
Published in
Medical Journal of Australia, November 2015
DOI 10.5694/mja14.01660
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie E Gibson‐Helm, Helena J Teede, Alice R Rumbold, Sanjeeva Ranasinha, Ross S Bailie, Jacqueline A Boyle

Abstract

To investigate associations between the provision of routine metabolic screening and follow-up in pregnancy and participation by primary health care centres in a large-scale continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative. Longitudinal analysis of 2592 audited maternal health records. Seventy-six community-controlled or government-operated primary health care centres serving predominantly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, in urban, regional or remote locations in five Australian states and territories. Up to four CQI cycles supported by the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease Research Partnership. Screening and follow-up for body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and diabetes in pregnancy. Overall, 87.9% of women attending the participating health centres were Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. Women attending a health centre after it had conducted one or more CQI cycles were more likely to receive BMI, blood pressure and diabetes screening. For example, the proportion of women receiving diabetes screening at baseline (before the first CQI cycle) was 56.1%; after cycle 1 it was 63.7% (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6), after cycle 2, 61.6% (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.7), after cycle 3, 63.7% (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6), and after cycle 4, 75.5% (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9-5.9). Diabetes screening was associated with higher self-ratings of overall organisational systems (P = 0.03), self-management support (P = 0.04) and organisational influence and integration (P = 0.01). These findings support the value of CQI approaches that focus on systems-level issues in primary care to improve the provision of recommended pregnancy care at primary health care centres in predominantly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Librarian 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#5,549
of 5,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,641
of 296,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#48
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.