↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Service Usage and Needs for Adults with ASD: The Importance of Living Situation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Service Usage and Needs for Adults with ASD: The Importance of Living Situation
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3729-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katerina M. Dudley, Mark R. Klinger, Allison Meyer, Patrick Powell, Laura G. Klinger

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), research examining the service experiences of this population is greatly needed. The current study investigated service use, unmet needs, and obstacles to service access for a large sample of adults with ASD. After accounting for various demographic factors known to impact service usage and needs, living situation was a significant predictor of service use, needs, and obstacles to services. Adults with ASD living with family reported less service use, higher unmet need, and more obstacles to accessing services. With more than half of this adult sample living with family, results have clear public policy implications to support the increasing population of adults with ASD living with aging caregivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 30%
Social Sciences 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,659,614
of 24,796,678 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#679
of 5,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,395
of 339,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#16
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,678 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.