↓ Skip to main content

Nitric Oxide Interacts with Caveolin-1 to Facilitate Autophagy-Lysosome-Mediated Claudin-5 Degradation in Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation-Treated Endothelial Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Nitric Oxide Interacts with Caveolin-1 to Facilitate Autophagy-Lysosome-Mediated Claudin-5 Degradation in Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation-Treated Endothelial Cells
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12035-015-9504-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Liu, John Weaver, Xinchun Jin, Yuan Zhang, Ji Xu, Ke J. Liu, Weiping Li, Wenlan Liu

Abstract

Using in vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) model, we have previously demonstrated that 2-h OGD induces rapid, caveolin-1-mediated dissociation of claudin-5 from the cellular cytoskeletal framework and quick endothelial barrier disruption. In this study, we further investigated the fate of translocated claudin-5 and the mechanisms by which OGD promotes caveolin-1 translocation. Exposure of bEND3 cells to 4-h OGD, but not 2-h OGD plus 2-h reoxygenation, resulted in claudin-5 degradation. Inhibition of autophagy or the fusion of autophagosome with lysosome, but not proteasome, blocked OGD-induced claudin-5 degradation. Moreover, knockdown of caveolin-1 with siRNA blocked OGD-induced claudin-5 degradation. Western blot analysis showed a transient colocalization of caveolin-1, claudin-5, and LC3B in autolysosome or lipid raft fractions at 2-h OGD. Of note, inhibiting autophagosome and lysosome fusion sustained the colocalization of caveolin-1, claudin-5, and LC3B throughout the 4-h OGD exposure. EPR spin trapping showed increased nitric oxide (NO) generation in 2-h OGD-treated cells, and inhibiting NO with its scavenger C-PTIO or inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitor 1400W prevented OGD-induced caveolin-1 translocation and claudin-5 degradation. Taken together, our data provide a novel mechanism underlying endothelial barrier disruption under prolonged ischemic conditions, in which NO promotes caveolin-1-mediated delivery of claudin-5 to the autophagosome for autophagy-lysosome-dependent degradation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,461
of 3,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,931
of 284,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#70
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.