You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurourology and Urodynamics, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/nau.23551 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Abrams, Karl‐Erik Andersson, Apostolos Apostolidis, Lori Birder, Donna Bliss, Linda Brubaker, Linda Cardozo, David Castro‐Diaz, P.R. O'Connell, Alan Cottenden, Nikki Cotterill, Dirk de Ridder, Roger Dmochowski, Chantal Dumoulin, Mandy Fader, Christopher Fry, Howard Goldman, Philip Hanno, Yukio Homma, Vik Khullar, Chris Maher, Ian Milsom, Diane Newman, Rien J.M. Nijman, Kevin Rademakers, Dudley Robinson, Peter Rosier, Eric Rovner, Stefano Salvatore, Masayuki Takeda, Adrian Wagg, Todd Wagner, Alan Wein, the members of the committees |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 369 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 75 | 20% |
| Unknown | 130 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 140 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,497,769
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#562
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,031
of 343,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#11
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.