| Title |
Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:jonb.0000039648.30935.1b |
| Authors |
Leslie A. Zebrowitz, Gillian Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 94 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,777,586
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
#235
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,832
of 69,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.