↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycinemax)

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Genome-wide association study, genomic prediction and marker-assisted selection for seed weight in soybean (Glycinemax)
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00122-015-2614-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaoping Zhang, Qijian Song, Perry B. Cregan, Guo-Liang Jiang

Abstract

Twenty-two loci for soybean SW and candidate genes conditioning seed development were identified; and prediction accuracies of GS and MAS were estimated through cross-validation and validation with unrelated populations. Soybean (Glycine max) is a major crop for plant protein and oil production, and seed weight (SW) is important for yield and quality in food/vegetable uses of soybean. However, our knowledge of genes controlling SW remains limited. To better understand the molecular mechanism underlying the trait and explore marker-based breeding approaches, we conducted a genome-wide association study in a population of 309 soybean germplasm accessions using 31,045 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and estimated the prediction accuracy of genomic selection (GS) and marker-assisted selection (MAS) for SW. Twenty-two loci of minor effect associated with SW were identified, including hotspots on Gm04 and Gm19. The mixed model containing these loci explained 83.4 % of phenotypic variation. Candidate genes with Arabidopsis orthologs conditioning SW were also proposed. The prediction accuracies of GS and MAS by cross-validation were 0.75-0.87 and 0.62-0.75, respectively, depending on the number of SNPs used and the size of training population. GS also outperformed MAS when the validation was performed using unrelated panels across a wide range of maturities, with an average prediction accuracy of 0.74 versus 0.53. This study convincingly demonstrated that soybean SW is controlled by numerous minor-effect loci. It greatly enhances our understanding of the genetic basis of SW in soybean and facilitates the identification of genes controlling the trait. It also suggests that GS holds promise for accelerating soybean breeding progress. The results are helpful for genetic improvement and genomic prediction of yield in soybean.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 20%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Engineering 3 2%
Mathematics 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 52 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,808,503
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,607
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,353
of 286,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.