↓ Skip to main content

Detecting Fraud: The Role of the Anonymous Reporting Channel

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Detecting Fraud: The Role of the Anonymous Reporting Channel
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2673-6
Authors

Elka Johansson, Peter Carey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 245 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Lecturer 18 7%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 93 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 86 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 12%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Computer Science 8 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 90 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,349,419
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,084
of 2,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,852
of 264,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.