You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/add.14424 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Murat Yücel, Erin Oldenhof, Serge H. Ahmed, David Belin, Joel Billieux, Henrietta Bowden‐Jones, Adrian Carter, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Luke Clark, Jason Connor, Mark Daglish, Geert Dom, Pinhas Dannon, Theodora Duka, Maria Jose Fernandez‐Serrano, Matt Field, Ingmar Franken, Rita Z. Goldstein, Raul Gonzalez, Anna E. Goudriaan, Jon E. Grant, Matthew J. Gullo, Robert Hester, David C. Hodgins, Bernard Le Foll, Rico S. C. Lee, Anne Lingford‐Hughes, Valentina Lorenzetti, Scott J. Moeller, Marcus R. Munafò, Brian Odlaug, Marc N. Potenza, Rebecca Segrave, Zsuzsika Sjoerds, Nadia Solowij, Wim van den Brink, Ruth J. van Holst, Valerie Voon, Reinout Wiers, Leonardo F. Fontenelle, Antonio Verdejo‐Garcia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 22% |
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 58% |
| Scientists | 21 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 338 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Professor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 19% |
| Unknown | 91 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 109 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 122 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,022,970
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#791
of 6,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,874
of 356,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#19
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.