↓ Skip to main content

Anthropogenic influence on sediment transport in the Whittard Canyon, NE Atlantic

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Pollution Bulletin, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anthropogenic influence on sediment transport in the Whittard Canyon, NE Atlantic
Published in
Marine Pollution Bulletin, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette M. Wilson, Kostas Kiriakoulakis, Robin Raine, Hans D. Gerritsen, Sabena Blackbird, A. Louise Allcock, Martin White

Abstract

Unusual peaks in turbidity were detected in two branches of the Whittard Canyon in June 2013. Enhanced nepheloid layers (ENLs) were defined as layers with concentrations of suspended particulate matter exceeding those of nepheloid layers typically observed in a given region. Here, ENLs had peaks in turbidity and elevated suspended particulate matter concentrations exceeding ~1mgL(-1) with the largest ENLs measuring between ~2-8mgL(-1). The ENLs measured ~100-260m in vertical height and were detected in water depths of between 640 and 2880m. Vessel Monitoring System data showed that high spatial and temporal activity of potential bottom trawling vessels coincided with the occurrence of the ENLs. Molar C/N ratios of the suspended organic material from the ENLs showed a high degree of degradation. Regular occurrences of such events are likely to have implications for increased sediment fluxes, burial of organic carbon and alteration of benthic and canyon ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,849,147
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#2,863
of 9,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,419
of 294,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Pollution Bulletin
#53
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.