↓ Skip to main content

Tate’s algorithm and F-theory

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Tate’s algorithm and F-theory
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/jhep08(2011)094
Authors

Sheldon Katz, David R. Morrison, Sakura Schäfer-Nameki, James Sully

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Japan 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 44%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 72%
Mathematics 3 17%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#3,234
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,645
of 134,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.