↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI texture analysis for grading gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI texture analysis for grading gliomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2984-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Austin Ditmer, Bin Zhang, Taimur Shujaat, Andrew Pavlina, Nicholas Luibrand, Mary Gaskill-Shipley, Achala Vagal

Abstract

Texture analysis (TA) can quantify variations in surface intensity or patterns, including some that are imperceptible to the human visual system. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiomic based filtration-histogram TA to differentiate high-grade from low-grade gliomas by assessing tumor heterogeneity. Patients with a histopathological diagnosis of glioma and preoperative 3T MRI imaging were included in this retrospective study. A region of interest was manually delineated on post-contrast T1 images. TA was performed using commercially available research software. The histogram parameters including mean, standard deviation, entropy, mean of the positive pixels, skewness, and kurtosis were analyzed at spatial scaling factors ranging from 0 to 6 mm. The parameters were correlated with WHO glioma grade using Spearman correlation. Areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated using ROC curve analysis to distinguish tumor grades. Of a total of 94 patients, 14 had low-grade gliomas and 80 had high-grade gliomas. Mean, SD, MPP, entropy and kurtosis each showed significant differences between glioma grades for different spatial scaling filters. Low and high-grade gliomas were best-discriminated using mean of 2 mm fine texture scale, with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 86% (AUC of 0.90). Quantitative measurement of heterogeneity using TA can discriminate high versus low-grade gliomas. Radiomic data of texture features can provide complementary diagnostic information for gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,970,822
of 24,287,697 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#899
of 3,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,777
of 337,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#20
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.