| Title |
Microscope and spectacle: On the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0715-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Audrey Verma, René van der Wal, Anke Fischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,742
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,579
of 299,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.