The chromatin binding domain, including the QPQRYG motif, of feline foamy virus Gag is required for viral DNA integration and nuclear accumulation of Gag and the viral genome
The retroviral Gag protein, the major component of released particles, plays different roles in particle assembly, maturation or infection of new host cells. Here, we characterize the Gag chromatin binding site including the highly conserved QPQRYG motif of feline foamy virus, a member of the Spumaretrovirinae. Mutagenesis of critical residues in the chromatin binding site/QPQRYG motif almost completely abrogates viral DNA integration and reduces nuclear accumulation of Gag and viral DNA. Genome packaging, reverse transcription, particle release and uptake into new target cells are not affected. The integrity of the QPQRYG motif appears to be important for processes after cytosolic entry, likely influencing incoming virus capsids or disassembly intermediates but not Gag synthesized de novo in progeny virus-producing cells. According to our data, chromatin binding is a shared feature among foamy viruses but further work is needed to understand the mechanisms involved.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#9,085
of 9,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,908
of 342,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#44
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
