↓ Skip to main content

Isolation via 454 sequencing and characterisation of microsatellites for Acacia montana (Fabaceae), Mallee wattle: an endemic shrub from southeastern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics Resources, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Isolation via 454 sequencing and characterisation of microsatellites for Acacia montana (Fabaceae), Mallee wattle: an endemic shrub from southeastern Australia
Published in
Conservation Genetics Resources, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12686-014-0321-6
Authors

Tara Hopley, Linda M. Broadhurst, Michael G. Gardner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,099
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#307
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,640
of 237,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.