↓ Skip to main content

Deficiencies in numerical models of anisotropic nonlinearly elastic materials

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Deficiencies in numerical models of anisotropic nonlinearly elastic materials
Published in
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10237-012-0442-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Ní Annaidh, M. Destrade, M. D. Gilchrist, J. G. Murphy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
India 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 89 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 32%
Researcher 25 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 65 68%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Materials Science 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,572,005
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#369
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,414
of 173,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.