↓ Skip to main content

Contrasting genetic architectures of schizophrenia and other complex diseases using fast variance-components analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contrasting genetic architectures of schizophrenia and other complex diseases using fast variance-components analysis
Published in
Nature Genetics, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Po-Ru Loh, Gaurav Bhatia, Alexander Gusev, Hilary K Finucane, Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan, Samuela J Pollack, Teresa R de Candia, Sang Hong Lee, Naomi R Wray, Kenneth S Kendler, Michael C O'Donovan, Benjamin M Neale, Nick Patterson, Alkes L Price

Abstract

Heritability analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) cohorts have yielded important insights into complex disease architecture, and increasing sample sizes hold the promise of further discoveries. Here we analyze the genetic architectures of schizophrenia in 49,806 samples from the PGC and nine complex diseases in 54,734 samples from the GERA cohort. For schizophrenia, we infer an overwhelmingly polygenic disease architecture in which ≥71% of 1-Mb genomic regions harbor ≥1 variant influencing schizophrenia risk. We also observe significant enrichment of heritability in GC-rich regions and in higher-frequency SNPs for both schizophrenia and GERA diseases. In bivariate analyses, we observe significant genetic correlations (ranging from 0.18 to 0.85) for several pairs of GERA diseases; genetic correlations were on average 1.3 tunes stronger than the correlations of overall disease liabilities. To accomplish these analyses, we developed a fast algorithm for multicomponent, multi-trait variance-components analysis that overcomes prior computational barriers that made such analyses intractable at this scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 415 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 26%
Researcher 96 22%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 62 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 101 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 11%
Neuroscience 23 5%
Computer Science 21 5%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 86 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,139,888
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,879
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,949
of 298,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.