↓ Skip to main content

Peer Social Skills and Theory of Mind in Children With Autism, Deafness, or Typical Development

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peer Social Skills and Theory of Mind in Children With Autism, Deafness, or Typical Development
Published in
Developmental Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.1037/a0039833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candida Peterson, Virginia Slaughter, Chris Moore, Henry M. Wellman

Abstract

Consequences of theory of mind (ToM) development for daily social lives of children are uncertain. Five to 13-year-olds (N = 195) with typical development, autism, or deafness (both native and late signers) took ToM tests and their teachers reported on their social skills for peer interaction (e.g., leadership, group entry). Groups differed in both ToM understanding (with late-signing deaf children especially delayed even relative to autistic children) and peer social skills (with autistic children especially delayed even relative to deaf late signers). Crucially, for the typically developing hearing children and deaf children alike, ToM understanding independently predicted peer social skills over and above age, gender, language ability, and, for deaf children, status as native- or late-signer. These novel findings offer some of the best evidence to date of the relevance of ToM cognitions to real-world social behavior for both these groups. However, for those with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) the pattern was different. The apparent link of ToM to peer competence was not a direct one but instead was significantly mediated by language ability. Several possible explanations for this intriguing autism-specific result were also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 18%
Student > Bachelor 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 11%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 86 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 149 42%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Linguistics 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Neuroscience 12 3%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 103 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,166,588
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#813
of 4,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,369
of 399,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.