↓ Skip to main content

Compound heterozygous mutations in the noncoding RNU4ATAC cause Roifman Syndrome by disrupting minor intron splicing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Compound heterozygous mutations in the noncoding RNU4ATAC cause Roifman Syndrome by disrupting minor intron splicing
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Merico, Maian Roifman, Ulrich Braunschweig, Ryan K. C. Yuen, Roumiana Alexandrova, Andrea Bates, Brenda Reid, Thomas Nalpathamkalam, Zhuozhi Wang, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram, Paul Gray, Alyson Kakakios, Jane Peake, Stephanie Hogarth, David Manson, Raymond Buncic, Sergio L. Pereira, Jo-Anne Herbrick, Benjamin J. Blencowe, Chaim M. Roifman, Stephen W. Scherer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,820,313
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,387
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,569
of 298,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#416
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.