↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant Imatinib for High-Risk GI Stromal Tumor: Analysis of a Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant Imatinib for High-Risk GI Stromal Tumor: Analysis of a Randomized Trial
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1200/jco.2015.62.9170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heikki Joensuu, Mikael Eriksson, Kirsten Sundby Hall, Annette Reichardt, Jörg T Hartmann, Daniel Pink, Giuliano Ramadori, Peter Hohenberger, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Marcus Schlemmer, Sebastian Bauer, Eva Wardelmann, Bengt Nilsson, Harri Sihto, Petri Bono, Raija Kallio, Jouni Junnila, Thor Alvegård, Peter Reichardt

Abstract

Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy are recommended for patients with GI stromal tumor (GIST) with high-risk features, according to survival findings in the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie) trial. To investigate whether the survival benefits have persisted, we performed the second planned analysis of the trial. Eligible patients had macroscopically completely excised, KIT-positive GIST with a high risk of recurrence, as determined by using the modified National Institutes of Health criteria. After surgery, the patients were randomly assigned to receive imatinib for either 1 or 3 years. The primary objective was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary objectives included survival. A total of 400 patients were entered onto this open-label study between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008. During a median follow-up of 90 months, 171 recurrences and 69 deaths were detected. Patients assigned to the 3-year group had longer RFS than those assigned to the 1- year group; 5-year RFS was 71.1% versus 52.3%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81; P < .001), and survival was 91.9% versus 85.3% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.97; P = .036). Patients in the 3-year group survived longer in the subset with centrally confirmed GIST and without macroscopic metastases at study entry (93.4% v 86.8%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.93; P = .024). Similar numbers of cardiac events and second cancers were recorded in the groups. Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy results in longer survival than 1 year of imatinib. High 5-year survival rates are achievable in patient populations with high-risk GIST.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Other 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,164,843
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6,950
of 22,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,483
of 300,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#95
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.