↓ Skip to main content

Fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg: clinical outcome in a large retrospective cohort

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg: clinical outcome in a large retrospective cohort
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00590-018-2299-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. P. H. Tam, A. G. F. Gibson, J. R. D. Murray, M Hassaballa

Abstract

Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is an overuse disorder typically affecting an athletic population. CECS is a diagnosis based on history and intracompartmental pressure (ICP) testing. CECS patients can be treated surgically by fasciotomy; however, research on the relationship between ICP and patient symptoms and also between ICP and patient-reported outcome post-fasciotomy is limited. This study aims to (1) assess functional outcome and patient satisfaction post-fasciotomy and (2) identify any potential correlation between ICP and reported levels of pain. 138 CECS patients who had ICP measurements and subsequently underwent fasciotomy were identified from our regional service for exercise-induced lower limb extremity pain between January 2000 and March 2017. Clinical outcomes were recorded at the time of ICP testing and in the post-operative follow-up clinic. Pain was reported using a verbal rating scale (VRS) ('low', 'moderate' or 'high') or as a visual analogue score (VAS) 0-10 (0 = least painful, 10 = most painful). Spearman's ranked correlation test was used to calculate correlation between ICP and reported pain. A total of 138 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study (mean age 29.7 ± 9.7 years, 110 M, 28 F) of which 109 patients (VRS n = 61, VAS n = 48) reported pain level at pre- and post-operative stages. Mean pre-operative VAS score was 8.52 ± 0.71, and decreased to 0.77 ± 0.69 post-operatively. An insignificant positive correlation (r = 0.046, two-tailed p = 0.76) was found between VAS pain and ICP. A significant moderate positive correlation (r = 0.497, two-tailed p = 0.01) was found between VRS pain and ICP. Fasciotomy significantly reduces pain and increases activity levels in CECS patients. ICP was found to positively correlate with patient-reported pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#329
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,563
of 334,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.