↓ Skip to main content

Outstanding Challenges in the Transferability of Ecological Models

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
171 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
391 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
855 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outstanding Challenges in the Transferability of Ecological Models
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine L. Yates, Phil J. Bouchet, M. Julian Caley, Kerrie Mengersen, Christophe F. Randin, Stephen Parnell, Alan H. Fielding, Andrew J. Bamford, Stephen Ban, A. Márcia Barbosa, Carsten F. Dormann, Jane Elith, Clare B. Embling, Gary N. Ervin, Rebecca Fisher, Susan Gould, Roland F. Graf, Edward J. Gregr, Patrick N. Halpin, Risto K. Heikkinen, Stefan Heinänen, Alice R. Jones, Periyadan K. Krishnakumar, Valentina Lauria, Hector Lozano-Montes, Laura Mannocci, Camille Mellin, Mohsen B. Mesgaran, Elena Moreno-Amat, Sophie Mormede, Emilie Novaczek, Steffen Oppel, Guillermo Ortuño Crespo, A. Townsend Peterson, Giovanni Rapacciuolo, Jason J. Roberts, Rebecca E. Ross, Kylie L. Scales, David Schoeman, Paul Snelgrove, Göran Sundblad, Wilfried Thuiller, Leigh G. Torres, Heroen Verbruggen, Lifei Wang, Seth Wenger, Mark J. Whittingham, Yuri Zharikov, Damaris Zurell, Ana M.M. Sequeira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 855 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 855 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 184 22%
Researcher 166 19%
Student > Master 120 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 4%
Other 117 14%
Unknown 177 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 32%
Environmental Science 219 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 3%
Engineering 19 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 2%
Other 63 7%
Unknown 235 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#443,289
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#255
of 3,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,352
of 345,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.