↓ Skip to main content

Materials issues and recent developments in molten carbonate fuel cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Materials issues and recent developments in molten carbonate fuel cells
Published in
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10008-012-1771-y
Authors

A. Kulkarni, S. Giddey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 18%
Materials Science 23 13%
Chemical Engineering 17 10%
Energy 16 9%
Chemistry 15 9%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,468,426
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#103
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,166
of 167,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.