↓ Skip to main content

Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
Published in
Resuscitation, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Wyllie, Jeffrey M. Perlman, John Kattwinkel, Myra H. Wyckoff, Khalid Aziz, Ruth Guinsburg, Han-Suk Kim, Helen G. Liley, Lindsay Mildenhall, Wendy M. Simon, Edgardo Szyld, Masanori Tamura, Sithembiso Velaphi, Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 19 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 49 26%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 53 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,897,038
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#2,126
of 5,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,635
of 292,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#34
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.