↓ Skip to main content

Escaping herbivory: ocean warming as a refuge for primary producers where consumer metabolism and consumption cannot pursue

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Escaping herbivory: ocean warming as a refuge for primary producers where consumer metabolism and consumption cannot pursue
Published in
Oecologia, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3438-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole L. Mertens, Bayden D. Russell, Sean D. Connell

Abstract

Ocean warming is anticipated to strengthen the persistence of turf-forming habitat, yet the concomitant elevation of grazer metabolic rates may accelerate per capita rates of consumption to counter turf predominance. Whilst this possibility of strong top-down control is supported by the metabolic theory of ecology (MTE), it assumes that consumer metabolism and consumption keep pace with increasing production. This assumption was tested by quantifying the metabolic rates of turfs and herbivorous gastropods under a series of elevated temperatures in which the ensuing production and consumption were observed. We discovered that as temperature increases towards near-future levels (year 2100), consumption rates of gastropods peak earlier than the rate of growth of producers. Hence, turfs have greater capacity to persist under near-future temperatures than the capacity for herbivores to counter their growth. These results suggest that whilst MTE predicts stronger top-down control, understanding whether consumer-producer responses are synchronous is key to assessing the future strength of top-down control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 38%
Environmental Science 27 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 23%