You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative evaluation of the STOMA psychosocial intervention programme for colorectal cancer patients with stoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.13821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siew Hoon Lim, Sally Wai Chi Chan, Jiunn Herng Lai, Hong‐Gu He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 23% |
| Psychology | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,012,829
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#2,198
of 5,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,710
of 353,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#49
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.