↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic utility of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in older patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Geriatric Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic utility of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in older patients
Published in
European Geriatric Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41999-018-0036-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sevinc Sarinc Ulasli, Deniz Koksal, Oguz Karcioglu, Elif Babaoglu, Sevgen Onder, Salih Emri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Geriatric Medicine
#701
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,158
of 344,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Geriatric Medicine
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.