| Title |
The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8 |
| Authors |
Subashini C. Jayasiri, Kevin D. Hyde, Hiran A. Ariyawansa, Jayarama Bhat, Bart Buyck, Lei Cai, Yu-Cheng Dai, Kamel A. Abd-Elsalam, Damien Ertz, Iman Hidayat, Rajesh Jeewon, E. B. Gareth Jones, Ali H. Bahkali, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Jian-Kui Liu, J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard, H. Thorsten Lumbsch, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Eric H. C. McKenzie, Jean-Marc Moncalvo, Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad, Henrik Nilsson, Ka-Lai Pang, Olinto L. Pereira, Alan J. L. Phillips, Olivier Raspé, Adam W. Rollins, Andrea I. Romero, Javier Etayo, Faruk Selçuk, Steven L. Stephenson, Satinee Suetrong, Joanne E. Taylor, Clement K. M. Tsui, Alfredo Vizzini, Mohamed A. Abdel-Wahab, Ting-Chi Wen, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Dong Qin Dai, Dinushani A. Daranagama, Asha J. Dissanayake, Anusha H. Ekanayaka, S. C. Fryar, Sinang Hongsanan, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Wen-Jing Li, Rekhani H. Perera, R. Phookamsak, Nimali I. de Silva, Kasun M. Thambugala, Qing Tian, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Rui-Lin Zhao, Qi Zhao, Ji-Chuan Kang, Itthayakorn Promputtha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 78 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,707,674
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#36
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,506
of 296,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them