↓ Skip to main content

On the Behavioral Foundations of the Law of Supply and Demand: Human Convergence and Robot Randomness

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Economics, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
On the Behavioral Foundations of the Law of Supply and Demand: Human Convergence and Robot Randomness
Published in
Experimental Economics, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020871917917
Authors

Paul J. Brewer, Maria Huang, Brad Nelson, Charles R. Plott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Professor 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 55%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 20%
Computer Science 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#168
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,214
of 135,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them