| Title |
Multidimensional Size Functions for Shape Comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10851-008-0096-z |
| Authors |
S. Biasotti, A. Cerri, P. Frosini, D. Giorgi, C. Landi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 11 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,468,612
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#57
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,696
of 83,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.