↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of acute rhinitis with a nasal spray containing tramazoline and essential oils: a multicenter, uncontrolled, observational trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of acute rhinitis with a nasal spray containing tramazoline and essential oils: a multicenter, uncontrolled, observational trial
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13601-015-0084-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gábor Katona, Mónika Sultész, Zsolt Farkas, Andrea Gyimesi, Andor Hirschberg, János Huszka, Ferenc Radvánszky, Ákos Simon, Gabriella Fülöp, Júlia Láng, Mária Ablonczy, Günther Nirnberger, Claudia Holm

Abstract

In this observational trial, data were collected on the effectiveness and tolerability/safety of a nasal spray containing tramazoline and essential oils (trade name Rhinospray(®) Plus) used for symptomatic treatment of acute rhinitis due to common cold. The trial was performed in 300 children, adolescents and adults, who were to be treated with Rhinospray(®) Plus for up to 4 times per day for up to 10 days. Primary endpoints were the change from baseline to final visit in the mean of three single symptom scores (blocked nose, sneezing, and runny nose) and the mean improvement in two quality-of-life parameters (ability to perform normal daytime activities and quality of sleep). A total of 108 children, 30 adolescents and 162 adults were treated with Rhinospray(®) Plus. No patient discontinued prematurely. There was a mean reduction of 2.0 ± 0.6 (standard deviation) in nasal symptom scores from baseline to final visit; 297 of 300 of patients (99.0 %) reported an improvement. The mean value for improvement in quality-of-life parameters was 1.3 ± 0.5. Improvement in daytime activities was reported by all 300 patients (100.0 %) and in quality of sleep by 292 patients (97.4 %). Effectiveness and tolerability were rated as 'very good' or 'good' by 95.4 % and 97.4 % of patients, respectively; the investigators rated effectiveness and tolerability as 'very good' or 'good' for 97.4 % and 100.0 % of patients, respectively. No adverse events were reported. Community-based patients reported a relief in acute rhinitis symptoms and improvement in quality of life as a result of treatment with Rhinospray(®) Plus. Treatment was well-tolerated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Psychology 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#503
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,289
of 296,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.