You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Basomedial amygdala mediates top-down control of anxiety and fear
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature15698 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Avishek Adhikari, Talia N. Lerner, Joel Finkelstein, Sally Pak, Joshua H. Jennings, Thomas J. Davidson, Emily Ferenczi, Lisa A. Gunaydin, Julie J. Mirzabekov, Li Ye, Sung-Yon Kim, Anna Lei, Karl Deisseroth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 36% |
| Japan | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 59% |
| Scientists | 22 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 991 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 948 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 267 | 27% |
| Researcher | 176 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 6% |
| Other | 158 | 16% |
| Unknown | 125 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 361 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 206 | 21% |
| Psychology | 90 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 7% |
| Unknown | 165 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#655,872
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#26,103
of 98,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,894
of 297,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#567
of 1,174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.