| Title |
Evidence for the involvement of d-aspartic acid in learning and memory of rat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Amino Acids, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00726-009-0369-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enza Topo, Andrea Soricelli, Angela Di Maio, Enrico D’Aniello, Maria Maddalena Di Fiore, Antimo D’Aniello |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,882,505
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#294
of 1,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,246
of 96,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.