| Title |
Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie K Tilson, Sandra L Kaplan, Janet L Harris, Andy Hutchinson, Dragan Ilic, Richard Niederman, Jarmila Potomkova, Sandra E Zwolsman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 33% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,641,625
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#632
of 4,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,303
of 149,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.