↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of theoretical procedures for hydrogen-atom abstraction by chlorine, and related reactions

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of theoretical procedures for hydrogen-atom abstraction by chlorine, and related reactions
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00214-011-0967-z
Authors

Bun Chan, Leo Radom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 57%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#547
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,923
of 113,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.