↓ Skip to main content

Age‐specific genome‐wide association study in glioblastoma identifies increased proportion of ‘lower grade glioma’‐like features associated with younger age

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age‐specific genome‐wide association study in glioblastoma identifies increased proportion of ‘lower grade glioma’‐like features associated with younger age
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/ijc.31759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quinn T. Ostrom, Ben Kinnersley, Georgina Armstrong, Terri Rice, Yanwen Chen, John K. Wiencke, Lucie S. McCoy, Helen M. Hansen, Christopher I. Amos, Jonine L. Bernstein, Elizabeth B. Claus, Jeanette E. Eckel‐Passow, Dora Il'yasova, Christoffer Johansen, Daniel H. Lachance, Rose K. Lai, Ryan T. Merrell, Sara H. Olson, Siegal Sadetzki, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Sanjay Shete, Joshua B. Rubin, Ulrika Andersson, Preetha Rajaraman, Stephen J. Chanock, Martha S. Linet, Zhaoming Wang, Meredith Yeager, on behalf of the GliomaScan consortium, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Margaret R. Wrensch, Beatrice Melin, Melissa L. Bondy, Jill. S. Barnholtz‐Sloan

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in the United States. Incidence of GBM increases with age, and younger age-at-diagnosis is significantly associated with improved prognosis. While the relationship between candidate GBM risk SNPs and age-at-diagnosis has been explored, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have not previously been stratified by age. Potential age-specific genetic effects were assessed in autosomal SNPs for GBM patients using data from four previous GWAS. Using age distribution tertiles (18-53, 54-64, 65+) datasets were analyzed using age-stratified logistic regression to generate p values, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and then combined using meta-analysis. There were 4,512 total GBM cases, and 10,582 controls used for analysis. Significant associations were detected at two previously identified SNPs in 7p11.2 (rs723527 [p54-63 =1.50x10-9 , OR54-63 =1.28, 95%CI54-63 =1.18-1.39; p64+ =2.14x10-11 , OR64+ =1.32, 95%CI64+ =1.21-1.43] and rs11979158 [p54-63 =6.13x10-8 , OR54-63 =1.35, 95%CI54-63 =1.21-1.50; p64+ =2.18x10-10 , OR64+ =1.42, 95%CI64+ =1.27-1.58]) but only in persons >54. There was also a significant association at the previously identified lower grade glioma (LGG) risk locus at 8q24.21 (rs55705857) in persons ages 18-53 (p18-53 =9.30x10-11 , OR18-53 =1.76, 95%CI18-53 =1.49-2.10). Within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) there was higher prevalence of 'LGG'-like tumor characteristics in GBM samples in those 18-53, with IDH1/2 mutation frequency of 15%, as compared to 2.1% [54-63] and 0.8% [64+] (p=0.0005). Age-specific differences in cancer susceptibility can provide important clues to etiology. The association of a SNP known to confer risk for IDH1/2 mutant glioma and higher prevalence of IDH1/2 mutation within younger individuals 18-53 suggests that more younger individuals may present initially with 'secondary glioblastoma.' This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,140,033
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#9,287
of 11,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,577
of 342,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#69
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.