↓ Skip to main content

Grip strength cutpoints for youth based on a clinically relevant bone health outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Grip strength cutpoints for youth based on a clinically relevant bone health outcome
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11657-018-0502-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro F. Saint-Maurice, Kelly Laurson, Gregory J. Welk, Joe Eisenmann, Luis Gracia-Marco, Enrique G. Artero, Francisco Ortega, Jonatan R. Ruiz, Luis A. Moreno, German Vicente-Rodriguez, Kathleen F. Janz

Abstract

The National Academy of Medicine recommends the handgrip for school-based surveillance of muscle strength for bone health. We established grip strength cutpoints that are linked to bone health in both US and European youth. These cutpoints could serve as a potential set of standards for surveillance and clinical applications. The U.S. National Academy of Medicine and experts in Europe recommend the use of grip strength as a valuable and accessible musculoskeletal fitness measure due to its association with bone health. This is the first study to facilitate this recommendation by developing bone health-related grip strength cutpoints for youth based on empirical associations with the well accepted marker of bone development, i.e., height-adjusted total body less head bone mineral content (TBLH_BMC). A purposive sample of healthy youth from Midwest USA (n = 433 youth; 14.1 ± 2.3 years; 1998-2004) and a random sample of healthy adolescents from Zaragoza, Spain (n = 355 youth; 14.9 ± 1.2 years; 2006-2007) were used to develop and test cut-points. Participants' grip strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer while height-adjusted TBLH_BMC was determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Grip strength scores were linked to TBLH_BMC using receiver operator characteristic curves, and grip strength cutpoints were tested based on the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and predictive odds ratios. All analyses were conducted in 2016. The AUC approximated or exceeded 0.80 for grip strength cutpoints, and the associated Se and Sp indices ranged from 53.6 to 92.5%. Sensitivity and Sp remained similar in the validation sample and those not meeting the grip strength cutpoints were five to eight times more likely to have insufficient TBLH_BMC, depending on their sex and cutpoint being considered. Grip strength is strongly related to TBLH_BMC, and the proposed cutpoints demonstrated acceptable classification accuracy for screening healthy youth and tracking healthy bone development in community settings. The utility of the cutpoints should be further examined in more diverse populations of youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 33 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,235,298
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#83
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,795
of 336,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.