↓ Skip to main content

Latitude, Digit Ratios, and Allen’s and Bergmann’s Rules: A Comment on Loehlin, McFadden, Medland, and Martin (2006)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Latitude, Digit Ratios, and Allen’s and Bergmann’s Rules: A Comment on Loehlin, McFadden, Medland, and Martin (2006)
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9149-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter L. Hurd, Sari M. van Anders

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Belgium 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 37%
Psychology 5 19%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,663,778
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,170
of 3,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,560
of 76,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.