↓ Skip to main content

Health Literacy in Unauthorized Mexican Immigrant Mothers and Risk of Developmental Delay in their Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Health Literacy in Unauthorized Mexican Immigrant Mothers and Risk of Developmental Delay in their Children
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-015-0284-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Hernandez-Mekonnen, Elise K. Duggan, Leonel Oliveros-Rosen, Marsha Gerdes, Stanton Wortham, Jack Ludmir, Ian M. Bennett

Abstract

The incidence of developmental delay and early intervention (EI) service utilization is not well documented among unauthorized Mexican immigrants, a vulnerable population. Individual interviews were conducted in Spanish with Mexican born women receiving maternal health care. Children 12-60 months of age were screened for developmental delay using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. 12 % (n = 8) of children assessed (n = 65) were at risk for developmental delay. Of those at risk 38 % (n = 3) participated in EI. An additional 26 % of the children (n = 17) qualified for further monitoring, and of those 59 % (n = 10) received EI. Women with low health literacy had more than four times the odds of having a child with risk of developmental delay (aOR 4.4; 95 % CI 1.3-15.4). Developmental delay was associated with low maternal health literacy in unauthorized Mexican immigrants; however, rates of self-reported EI use in this population are higher than those seen nationally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 21%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,184,606
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#786
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,290
of 328,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#23
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.