↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1052 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
782 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1505917
Pubmed ID
Authors

W Marston Linehan, Paul T Spellman, Christopher J Ricketts, Chad J Creighton, Suzanne S Fei, Caleb Davis, David A Wheeler, Bradley A Murray, Laura Schmidt, Cathy D Vocke, Myron Peto, Abu Amar M Al Mamun, Eve Shinbrot, Anurag Sethi, Samira Brooks, W Kimryn Rathmell, Angela N Brooks, Katherine A Hoadley, A Gordon Robertson, Denise Brooks, Reanne Bowlby, Sara Sadeghi, Hui Shen, Daniel J Weisenberger, Moiz Bootwalla, Stephen B Baylin, Peter W Laird, Andrew D Cherniack, Gordon Saksena, Scott Haake, Jun Li, Han Liang, Yiling Lu, Gordon B Mills, Rehan Akbani, Mark D M Leiserson, Benjamin J Raphael, Pavana Anur, Donald Bottaro, Laurence Albiges, Nandita Barnabas, Toni K Choueiri, Bogdan Czerniak, Andrew K Godwin, A Ari Hakimi, Thai H Ho, James Hsieh, Michael Ittmann, William Y Kim, Bhavani Krishnan, Maria J Merino, Kenna R Mills Shaw, Victor E Reuter, Ed Reznik, Carl S Shelley, Brian Shuch, Sabina Signoretti, Ramaprasad Srinivasan, Pheroze Tamboli, George Thomas, Satish Tickoo, Kenneth Burnett, Daniel Crain, Johanna Gardner, Kevin Lau, David Mallery, Scott Morris, Joseph D Paulauskis, Robert J Penny, Candace Shelton, W Troy Shelton, Mark Sherman, Eric Thompson, Peggy Yena, Melissa T Avedon, Jay Bowen, Julie M Gastier-Foster, Mark Gerken, Kristen M Leraas, Tara M Lichtenberg, Nilsa C Ramirez, Tracie Santos, Lisa Wise, Erik Zmuda, John A Demchok, Ina Felau, Carolyn M Hutter, Margi Sheth, Heidi J Sofia, Roy Tarnuzzer, Zhining Wang, Liming Yang, Jean C Zenklusen, Jiashan Zhang, Brenda Ayala, Julien Baboud, Sudha Chudamani, Jia Liu, Laxmi Lolla, Rashi Naresh, Todd Pihl, Qiang Sun, Yunhu Wan, Ye Wu, Adrian Ally, Miruna Balasundaram, Saianand Balu, Rameen Beroukhim, Tom Bodenheimer, Christian Buhay, Yaron S N Butterfield, Rebecca Carlsen, Scott L Carter, Hsu Chao, Eric Chuah, Amanda Clarke, Kyle R Covington, Mahmoud Dahdouli, Ninad Dewal, Noreen Dhalla, Harsha V Doddapaneni, Jennifer A Drummond, Stacey B Gabriel, Richard A Gibbs, Ranabir Guin, Walker Hale, Alicia Hawes, D Neil Hayes, Robert A Holt, Alan P Hoyle, Stuart R Jefferys, Steven J M Jones, Corbin D Jones, Divya Kalra, Christie Kovar, Lora Lewis, Jie Li, Yussanne Ma, Marco A Marra, Michael Mayo, Shaowu Meng, Matthew Meyerson, Piotr A Mieczkowski, Richard A Moore, Donna Morton, Lisle E Mose, Andrew J Mungall, Donna Muzny, Joel S Parker, Charles M Perou, Jeffrey Roach, Jacqueline E Schein, Steven E Schumacher, Yan Shi, Janae V Simons, Payal Sipahimalani, Tara Skelly, Matthew G Soloway, Carrie Sougnez, Angela Tam, Donghui Tan, Nina Thiessen, Umadevi Veluvolu, Min Wang, Matthew D Wilkerson, Tina Wong, Junyuan Wu, Liu Xi, Jane Zhou, Jason Bedford, Fengju Chen, Yao Fu, Mark Gerstein, David Haussler, Katayoon Kasaian, Phillip Lai, Shiyun Ling, Amie Radenbaugh, David Van Den Berg, John N Weinstein, Jingchun Zhu, Monique Albert, Iakovina Alexopoulou, Jeremiah J Andersen, J Todd Auman, John Bartlett, Sheldon Bastacky, Julie Bergsten, Michael L Blute, Lori Boice, Roni J Bollag, Jeff Boyd, Erik Castle, Ying-Bei Chen, John C Cheville, Erin Curley, Benjamin Davies, April DeVolk, Rajiv Dhir, Laura Dike, John Eckman, Jay Engel, Jodi Harr, Ronald Hrebinko, Mei Huang, Lori Huelsenbeck-Dill, Mary Iacocca, Bruce Jacobs, Michael Lobis, Jodi K Maranchie, Scott McMeekin, Jerome Myers, Joel Nelson, Jeremy Parfitt, Anil Parwani, Nicholas Petrelli, Brenda Rabeno, Somak Roy, Andrew L Salner, Joel Slaton, Melissa Stanton, R Houston Thompson, Leigh Thorne, Kelinda Tucker, Paul M Weinberger, Cynthia Winemiller, Leigh Anne Zach, Rosemary Zuna

Abstract

Background Papillary renal-cell carcinoma, which accounts for 15 to 20% of renal-cell carcinomas, is a heterogeneous disease that consists of various types of renal cancer, including tumors with indolent, multifocal presentation and solitary tumors with an aggressive, highly lethal phenotype. Little is known about the genetic basis of sporadic papillary renal-cell carcinoma, and no effective forms of therapy for advanced disease exist. Methods We performed comprehensive molecular characterization of 161 primary papillary renal-cell carcinomas, using whole-exome sequencing, copy-number analysis, messenger RNA and microRNA sequencing, DNA-methylation analysis, and proteomic analysis. Results Type 1 and type 2 papillary renal-cell carcinomas were shown to be different types of renal cancer characterized by specific genetic alterations, with type 2 further classified into three individual subgroups on the basis of molecular differences associated with patient survival. Type 1 tumors were associated with MET alterations, whereas type 2 tumors were characterized by CDKN2A silencing, SETD2 mutations, TFE3 fusions, and increased expression of the NRF2-antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway. A CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was observed in a distinct subgroup of type 2 papillary renal-cell carcinomas that was characterized by poor survival and mutation of the gene encoding fumarate hydratase (FH). Conclusions Type 1 and type 2 papillary renal-cell carcinomas were shown to be clinically and biologically distinct. Alterations in the MET pathway were associated with type 1, and activation of the NRF2-ARE pathway was associated with type 2; CDKN2A loss and CIMP in type 2 conveyed a poor prognosis. Furthermore, type 2 papillary renal-cell carcinoma consisted of at least three subtypes based on molecular and phenotypic features. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 782 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 763 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 146 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 14%
Other 68 9%
Student > Bachelor 62 8%
Student > Master 53 7%
Other 169 22%
Unknown 175 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 224 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 154 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 15%
Computer Science 15 2%
Engineering 15 2%
Other 60 8%
Unknown 200 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 302. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#116,292
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,786
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,495
of 299,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#50
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.