↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of mortality among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Ontario

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Public Health, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of mortality among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Ontario
Published in
Canadian Journal of Public Health, August 2018
DOI 10.17269/s41997-018-0124-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Stankiewicz, Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz, Michael McIsaac, Shahin Shooshtari, Robert Balogh

Abstract

To determine recent mortality rates among Ontarian adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and investigate changes over time in contrast to the general population. To determine the most commonly reported underlying causes of death and explore related coding practices. Using linked health administrative data, four cohorts of adults with IDD aged 25-99 living in Ontario were followed for 1 year (one cohort for each year between 2011 and 2014). Deaths (2011 to 2014) and causes of death (2011 to 2013) were identified, and age-standardized mortality rates were calculated annually. For 2013, overall and sex-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Mortality ratios were also examined across 5-year age groups. Commonly reported causes of death were tabulated by ICD-10 chapter, differences by sex examined, and cause-specific SMRs calculated. All deaths with IDD diagnostic codes reported as underlying cause of death were identified. Mortality rates among individuals with IDD have been decreasing over time; in 2014, the mortality rate was 22.6 deaths per 1000 person-years. Disparities in mortality rates relative to the general population decreased with increasing age. Men with IDD had higher mortality rates than women with IDD. The most common causes of death among individuals with IDD were cardiovascular disease, neoplasms, and diseases of the respiratory system. An IDD diagnostic code was reported as cause of death in 3.8% of cases. The ongoing excess mortality among Ontarians with IDD should be closely monitored by policy makers and service providers. Attention to cause of death reporting should be considered so that cause of death can be thoroughly examined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Social Sciences 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,935,266
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#815
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,423
of 334,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.