↓ Skip to main content

Numerals and neural reuse

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Numerals and neural reuse
Published in
Synthese, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-01922-y
Authors

Max Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 24%
Arts and Humanities 4 16%
Philosophy 2 8%
Linguistics 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,123,626
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,477
of 2,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,069
of 347,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.