↓ Skip to main content

Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century
Published in
Conservation Letters, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12211
Authors

Daniel Decker, Christian Smith, Ann Forstchen, Darragh Hare, Emily Pomeranz, Catherine Doyle‐Capitman, Krysten Schuler, John Organ

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 235 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 63 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 26%
Environmental Science 57 23%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 73 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,650,355
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#515
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,770
of 400,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.