↓ Skip to main content

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial unselective channel behaves as a physiological uncoupling system regulated by Ca2+, Mg2+, phosphate and ATP

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial unselective channel behaves as a physiological uncoupling system regulated by Ca2+, Mg2+, phosphate and ATP
Published in
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10863-015-9632-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfredo Cabrera-Orefice, Rodrigo Ibarra-García-Padilla, Rocío Maldonado-Guzmán, Sergio Guerrero-Castillo, Luis A. Luévano-Martínez, Victoriano Pérez-Vázquez, Manuel Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Salvador Uribe-Carvajal

Abstract

It is proposed that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae the Mitochondrial Unselective Channel ( Sc MUC) is tightly regulated constituting a physiological uncoupling system that prevents overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Mg(2+), Ca(2+) or phosphate (Pi) close Sc MUC, while ATP or a high rate of oxygen consumption open it. We assessed Sc MUC activity by measuring in isolated mitochondria the respiratory control, transmembrane potential (ΔΨ), swelling and production of ROS. At increasing [Pi], less [Ca(2+)] and/or [Mg(2+)] were needed to close Sc MUC or increase ATP synthesis. The Ca(2+)-mediated closure of Sc MUC was prevented by high [ATP] while the Mg(2+) or Pi effect was not. When Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) were alternatively added or chelated, Sc MUC opened and closed reversibly. Different effects of Ca(2+) vs Mg(2+) effects were probably due to mitochondrial Mg(2+) uptake. Our results suggest that Sc MUC activity is dynamically controlled by both the ATP/Pi ratio and divalent cation fluctuations. It is proposed that the reversible opening/closing of Sc MUC leads to physiological uncoupling and a consequent decrease in ROS production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#21,376,200
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#395
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,985
of 288,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.